DeepFittingNet: A deep neural network-based approach for simplifying cardiac T1 and T2 estimation with improved robustness

link to paper

DeepFittingNet: A deep neural network-based approach for simplifying cardiac T1 and T2 estimation with improved robustness

Rui Guo, Dongyue Si, Yingwei Fan, Xiaofeng Qian, Haina Zhang, Haiyan Ding, Xiaoying Tang

Abstract

Purpose

To develop and evaluate a deep neural network (DeepFittingNet) for T1/T2 estimation of the most commonly used cardiovascular MR mapping sequences to simplify data processing and improve robustness.

Theory and Methods

DeepFittingNet is a 1D neural network composed of a recurrent neural network (RNN) and a fully connected (FCNN) neural network, in which RNN adapts to the different number of input signals from various sequences and FCNN subsequently predicts A, B, and Tx of a three-parameter model. DeepFittingNet was trained using Bloch-equation simulations of MOLLI and saturation-recovery single-shot acquisition (SASHA) T1 mapping sequences, and T2-prepared balanced SSFP (T2-prep bSSFP) T2 mapping sequence, with reference values from the curve-fitting method. Several imaging confounders were simulated to improve robustness. The trained DeepFittingNet was tested using phantom and in-vivo signals, and compared to the curve-fitting algorithm.

Results

In testing, DeepFittingNet performed T1/T2 estimation of four sequences with improved robustness in inversion-recovery T1 estimation. The mean bias in phantom T1 and T2 between the curve-fitting and DeepFittingNet was smaller than 30 and 1 ms, respectively. Excellent agreements between both methods was found in the left ventricle and septum T1/T2 with a mean bias <6 ms. There was no significant difference in the SD of both the left ventricle and septum T1/T2 between the two methods.

Conclusion

DeepFittingNet trained with simulations of MOLLI, SASHA, and T2-prep bSSFP performed T1/T2 estimation tasks for all these most used sequences. Compared with the curve-fitting algorithm, DeepFittingNet improved the robustness for inversion-recovery T1 estimation and had comparable performance in terms of accuracy and precision.